Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Pubsub
Once again, a big "cultural differences" article out there on the Internet calls for a little commentary and reality checking. From 10 Reasons Japan Is Better Than America (a title nicely crafted to bring in the hits) on the Hunter Nuttall website, here are some excerpts from the list, followed by my comments: 1. The world is their buffet: ...when they find that someone has something they like, they’re perfectly happy to make it their own... They needed a language, so they borrowed Chinese... It doesn’t matter if different things conflict. Once they become Japanese, there is no conflict. Japan is the Borg. You will be assimilated. Clearly this is all well-meaning, but we're looking at another old, tired chestnut that needs to be laid to rest. Yes, the Japanese take in culture from the rest of the world and - as the culturologists always intone - "make it uniquely their own". Yes, the Japanese language takes in many words from other languages. Yes, Japan comfortably sits new things next to old things. But here's the kicker: the rest of humanity does exactly the same thing. Where is there a hint of evidence that other societies don't eagerly take in culture from every and any source? The topic really deserves a good, critical whack later. There's a blatant double standard that needs to be addressed, in which things non-Japanese – "Western", mostly – are seen as a dull default unworthy of notice. To use the article author's own examples, when there's an old Japanesse women in a kimono next to her grandkid in a T-shirt, with both Osaka Castle and a Starbucks in the background, the culturologists swoon over "contrast" and "old mixing with new". But when we see a "Western" teen in T-shirt playing a piano (a centuries-old traditional instrument), or even a keyboard (a happy mash-up of Renaissance culture with modern electronics), all with Edinburgh castle and a Burger King in the background, nobody says a thing. It gets written off as "normal". Why the double standard? (An aside on Chinese: Japan borrowed Chinese, and its writing system, long ago as a language of scholarship. Today, many elements of that writing system and many Chinese words remain in Japanese, but let's make clear that the Japanese language itself is not based on or related to Chinese. I assume the author knows that and simply glossed over it.) 2. No shaking hands: That's not quite true. Shaking hands is a growing practice in Japan. But, I agree, you typically don't need to do it here, and as the author says, the lack of 'shaking is nicely hygienic. 4. Taking your shoes off indoors: Darn straight. I know some US families that keep this rule as a norm, but most don't. I'd love to see everyone adopt the shoes-off indoor lifestyle. To inject some context, though: A typical shoes-okay household in the US or wherever will have enough decency to place a mat outside the entrance, and will expect it to be used to wipe the shoes! A common picture of "Western" adults tracking clods of mud throughout a house isn't often an accurate one. And just in the name of orneriness, I'll inject a wee bit of Devil's advocacy as well. Assuming that an entrant's shoes are actually clean, what's actually more sanitary from the poor floor's perspective: an inert rubber shoe sole, or a bare human foot exuding sweat, oils, and smell? Something to think about. 5. No tax, no tips, no pennies, no nickels, no quarters: Good one. No tipping, alone, is enough to make me want to live here in Japan forever. Expected tipping is a nasty custom I would love to see disappear. And while Japan does have coins as small as pennies, the author is correct that they're not used as much in prices – though I'm not sure how that's a big benefit, as sales tax then makes you fish for the wee coins anyway. (When prices are listed with tax included, they're certainly not always a neat multiple of 5 yen.) Perhaps what the author appreciates is the relative lack of annoying US-style "$0.89", "$49.99" etc. pricing. If that's what he likes about prices in Japan, I'm with him! Bookmark/Search this post with: |
|||
Technorati Tags: |
|
Re: Commenting on "10 Reasons Japan Is Better Than America"
Sorry for the delay in approving your comment on my blog; I was out of town for a few days. I don't want to take the time to respond in detail to all of your points, but let me address a few of them:
- "Yes, the Japanese take in culture from the rest of the world and - as the culturologists always intone - "make it uniquely their own"... But here's the kicker: the rest of humanity does exactly the same thing."
To some extent that's true of course, but it seems more prevalent in Japan. For example, according to "Insight Guides: Japan,"
"The average Japanese thinks nothing of marrying at a Shinto shrine, burying loved ones in a Buddhist cemetery, or boisterously celebrating Christmas. Although the devout Christian or Muslim -- each with a monotheistic god demanding unswerving fidelity, the typical Japanese sees no contradiction."
- Your comments about kaizen go against a lot of the stuff I've read. I agree that the word literally means just improvement, but everything I've read has said that it carries a much deeper meaning. If your assertion is accurate, you might want to start by correcting the Wikipedia entry on kaizen.
- "And to address a particular brand of pet peeve that always plagues "culture" articles: there's that omnipresent abuse of the term "the Japanese". Sorry, but "the Japanese" did not build a robot that can play the trumpet. Toyota did. More specifically, some subset of Toyota employees did. The remaining 99.x% of "the Japanese" most emphatically, unmistakably did not build that robot. I'll never understand why people don't get that vital point."
I think everyone gets that point. It's like saying "the Americans dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima." Which Americans? All of them? Of course not; only one American did. But people know what you mean when you say this.
- "I hope the disagreements don't come across as condescending toward the article's author. They're (mostly) minor objections, and I don't want to read unintended tone into the author's words."
Your comments are most welcome, and I don't mind them at all. You're right that some of what I said was tongue in cheek or simple shorthand. It really was just meant to point out some things I liked about Japan. Thank you for taking the discussion to the next level.
Re: Commenting on "10 Reasons Japan Is Better Than America"
My apologies in return for a slow reply. I've been in the US part of this month.
Some points:
Re "mixed" culture:
For example, according to "Insight Guides: Japan," "The average Japanese thinks nothing of marrying at a Shinto shrine, burying loved ones in a Buddhist cemetery, or boisterously celebrating Christmas. Although the devout Christian or Muslim -- each with a monotheistic god demanding unswerving fidelity, the typical Japanese sees no contradiction."
I expected there was a source for your thought here; I don't imagine that you're making things up! : ) My beef is precisely against many books with names like "Insight Guides: Japan", which I've found over long years to be often filled with goofiness. Not as part of some conspiracy to mislead, but simply by way of not thinking through things critically.
The above is a case in point: the "purity" of, say, Christianity is a myth. Take its holiest day, Christmas: Celebrating the birth of a Jew who added new teachings to traditional Jewish ones, it originated in pre-Christian winter solstice celebrations, borrows its date from an ancient Roman sun-worship festival, picked up Germanic and Scandinavian pagan elements like trees, wreaths, and "Yuletide", and is jam-packed with things like Santa and presents that have no connection to Christ/God whatsoever.
Mixing up religions, without contradiction, is the norm for humanity, and not some special Japan thing. (I know Christmas isn't labeled with multiple religion names, like Buddhism+Shinto, but placing labels over substance is exactly where such books go wrong. ...Ack, it's a big topic, more blog fodder for later! : )
Anyway, I certainly don't fault you for going by what supposed experts say. Lord knows how many misbeliefs about the world I hold, based on "expert" claims that I'm not in a position to debate!
Re Kaizen: Well, let me support your side here. I'm right when I say that "kaizen" in Japanese doesn't mean "continual improvement" or have any deep meaning whatsoever. But how about the newer English word "kaizen"? The word is now part of English – I assume first used by management guru types – and arguably has precisely the meaning you ascribed to it. So you can say you're right!
I'd just like to take the opportunity to let the world know that the Japanese word differs.
(Incidentally, I wonder, with tongue in cheek, how the word first came to English. Maybe in the same apocryphal way as "kangaroo". Like this:
American management guru: "Wow, the work you've done in this auto plant is amazing. Please, you must tell me, what is the Ancient Oriental Secret behind it all?"
Japanese factory guys: "Hmm? Nothing, really... just 'kaizen' – that is, we just make improvements when we see someth..."
Guru: "Astounding! I must tell the world of this mystical Asian 'Kye - Zen' philosophy! If only the Western world is ready for it! My book will prepare them - coming soon, only $29.99!"
Factory guys: <look at each other, scratch heads> )
Re "the Japanese" making the robot: I know, you're only using shorthand when you say that. It's no crime, and is common practice. But it's a shorthand that does impede understanding in the big picture, IMHO; so many people do read too much into such shorthand. (As in, "Hmm, 'the Japanese' made that robot, so 'the Japanese' must be adept at robot-building, so..." And it all goes downhill from there.)
My peeve is that saying "the Japanese built a robot" is no less silly – and I do mean not one iota less silly – than saying "Northern hemisperians built a robot..." or (if an all-male team) "males built a robot..." or "dark-haired people built a robot..." etc.
I'll just never fathom the world's obsession with filing human activity under the utterly unrelated labels of arbitrarily-drawn political entities. But that's just the orneriness talking. : )
Finally, your mention of "the next level" was a good choice of words. I know it's not a level you were aiming for, and isn't the focus of your blog, so I don't want to nitpick things. It's just the way the Internet goes: post something, and someone else may take that chance to run with the topic onto other tangents. Thanks for the opportunity!
Post new comment